oneness abides

oneness is not a mental concept in its construction.

oneness is a heart-brain construction.

oneness is from the fabric of emotional intelligence.

oneness is not based on the frequencies of think

but is foundationally sourced from emotional frequencies.

fear counts on mental frequencies 

for its impactful overage of control.

but there is an awareness intelligence 

that is not based on sensory input 

as the mandate for what it is attentive to.

the human act-out is the nature 

of the conundrum of experience.

and as long as experience is mentally ordained,

language is made to do the work of the mental dominion.

but the feel-state, by frequency access, 

outflanks the mind-state range of occupancy.

there is greater receptivity from the heart-brain 

in a vaster array of frequency accesses

than there is in the mind state.

the mind state works for discernment 

under the assumption of the definition of itself.

the heart-brain works from the connectivity of oneness

and not from the definition of self ever ascertaining. 

in the mind-state, the creation of the computer 

is the consensual definition 

as the representation of oneness.

and the design of the computer of the mind 

is its bicameral sense of self-definition,

in that it only, by the nature of conclusions, 

agrees to agreement.

the heart-brain is a resonate brain, 

which is in reception to greater frequencies 

that are outside the brain range of strictly cognitional.

but the heart-brain is part of the quantum reality 

that humans simultaneously exist in,

beyond, behind, and beneath what the brain registers 

as relevancy.

we are preoccupied with the conundrum 

of fear-driven reality in this, the world of selfdom.

the preoccupation of selfdom techniques and technology

terminates into the egoistic representation 

established by the concept and usage of money

in the mindset of value to humans,

until the human predicament is one superior mind-self

and everyone is in attribute recognition and honoring of it.

the difficulty is when and where that happens. 

when and where all minds are in service to one mind,

that also becomes the unacknowledged technique 

of the birth of oneness,

yet undisclosed to the self-mind in its govern-ship.

all practices of mind dominance are also 

the practices of oneness deep within, yet undiscovered.

mind dominance is always unconsciously in pursuit 

of the evolution of oneness forthcoming.

and the deeper truth is that 

that is the result of this, 

not value but love.

in that light, love becomes the one transitional word

that defies mental definition as its home base.

the word love is the one word that has definitional meaning 

outside of the mind constructed of time 

in the presence of space.

it is the admittance of the living truth, creatively enterprised

rather than a spoken truth, 

that lives in the finality of time and space occupancy.

bitcoin and blockchain are positive constructions 

towards that end as opposed to war and imprisonment, 

as negative approaches to the same endpoint 

of mind-occupancy and cognitive certitude.

mindfulness is committed to 

the audience-aspect of experience. 

therefore human act-out feeds upon themselves, 

as the selves of themselves.

there is nothing of generative radiance in that mindstate. 

that greater quality of broadcast only comes 

from the heart state 

and travels more in subtle frequencies 

that are emotionally generative 

and not mentally ordained.

this is a deeper truth of the origin 

of the manifest of physicality 

in that, as humans, we occupy bodies.

whereby sexuality, as a hormone-driven premise,

is one of the basic themes of experience entry

and subsequent participation.

one of the fundamental problems of mental certitude 

is definiteness, 

which is up against the concept of ongoing time.

in an attempt to resolve that issue 

there is the creation of computer intelligence 

or the constancy of the current moment 

in reference to the ongoingness of time.

the difficulty about that particular technique 

as a process, 

is that it needs to create material in referential ways 

that is of a method of certitude 

and also of dimensional limitations 

rather than expansiveness into ever expansiveness, 

as an ongoing theory of being in the now.

a metaphor for all of this is, 

imagine that there is a river flowing 

and a human's concept is to take hand-fulls, 

glasses full or buckets full in some effortful respects 

to direct and contain the river's volume and direction.

while in a heartfelt way, 

that version is to go into the river 

and become the water of the river 

and learn the wisdom, the energetic dynamics 

and the vibrational isness of the flow. 

and therefore control is discovered to mean surrender

to a greater sense of integrities 

than mindfulness can conceptually embrace.

all of reality is mentally metaphorical 

until emotional oneness is quantum realized . . .