ah, to witness thought,
from very deeply within.
from a dimension,
though not involved in that process.
and not to observe for its content,
but its manner of unfolding its own existence,
its unique method of delivery,
the means with which it is,
unto itself.
recognition creates a surface,
the intimacy of this soft scramble
that cognizance will take
and how that deliverance comes to fore.
that a dimensional context holds steady,
so that the impression sustains,
as if the mood of being
has gained a sense of pronouncement.
and where within
that commits such evidence
to memory,
and by what means
tethered and adhered.
and how much of its means,
its medium,
its message,
has emotion played as source,
substance, significance,
voyeur, voice,
and the presence of reception?
and so, from inception
and then, taken to where?
for what means, survives
and is duly noted
as representative there of,
and taken to mean
that which carries on,
in a timely manner?
and then proceeds
just as a thought
duly noted,
does? . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment