there is ever the breach
between what is said
and what is, as it is.
talk, in the override, is,
as if wardrobe applied,
and sensory directives flourish
as if the how and the what to see.
the comeback is for language that aligns.
for we are topic bound to the same demise.
what we come to share
are the pro or con solutions,
as if you see what I just saw
and the vices-a-verses-a, is commonly true.
then we both believe in what we saw
and the principle of our sightedness
is then relevance.
now we have the lateral pronouncement
that we agree to see much the same
and then hold it as a shared contentiousness about it.
we have fundamentally agreed
to our versionary perceptions
to be reality's disguise,
as the backdrop for our human relevance
on each and every matter.
we are then positional as a people
who, as humans of relevance,
are notwithstanding . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment