we have DNA love.
how to make that appear as real?
all of circumstance is unrealized coincidence.
most of perception is not insightful.
we all have naming incessancy,
but nuance aware
beyond the need for superficial certitude.
who goes there?
we have DNA love.
we are ancestral livingness.
we have,
before primitive got its name,
before junk DNA got popular.
we are the latest versions of a selfless crew.
we specied,
as if to adventure?
before we DNA-ed,
what could have been a care?
love before definition has a life?
yes, but
we have settled for meaningful,
as a popularized sense of beingness
and a packaged sense of selfdom.
but we still, thought quite secretly.
we still have DNA love.
and before that,
an isness,
into then-some . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment