as if in essence delivered 10/23/19

for humans, mass is idealized

but it is the biggest pretend of all.

if location is dependent upon placement 

and placement is a sense of fixed position

then our view of everything is quite illusory.

the art of human behavior 

is a form of slow-motion act-outs 

compared to the actual occurrence 

of vibratory as mass.

objectivity only reflects the prejudice 

of us as the viewers.

the world, as we know it,

is a biblical version of ourselves 

as observation’s caste.

as long as we have time 

as part of the observation equation,

nothing exists that we can generate 

as evident as such.

as long as we pride ourselves

as audience with interest,

we are distant and imprisoned 

by the concepts we keep generative.

connectivity is non-negotiable. 

it is the universe’s prayer 

by the same way, degree 

and one pointedness of time.

where by the invocation of itself,

is spot-on and therefore timeless.

but on us, by our methods, 

we have a concept of details as our following.

yet all of matter reveals the conundrum 

mirroring this basis of bias of our human understanding.

to us, information is real 

and we are steadfast timely with it

as if conceived and captured within it.

we have invented a distance 

from the energetic truth

and now we have to resolve 

that distance we intellectually maintain.

and yet wanting to do so 

by still being here, the way we are,

but only more advanced,

yet in much the same mindful way.

maybe this is a perverse experiment:

imagine life after death as authentic, 

and how to prepare for it 

while still grounded 

in the supposed here and now.

in the way we are proposed 

as that, living in the here and now.

yet we don’t have a science behind the mind,

but only of it,

which impedes the essential process, profoundly.

as soon as we name or label 

or actually cogitate into thought,

we are proceeding 

into the displacement of being.

communication is already an island 

removed from being.

conveyance offers alignment 

but not guaranteed reception

in a thought driven world.

we live in the conundrum 

and yet propose its worth.

so how do we question questioning

and then go about with its worth?

the way our minds currently work

every question is only rhetorical 

as if in essence obliquely delivered . . .