a concept for line three 10/2/19

how we have it that time exists 

doesn’t actually exist.

it is an intellectual assumption 

without the possibility of question. 

the nature of language as proof 

prohibits the inquiry 

by the mental apparatus in usage. 

the syntax of rational consciousness 

prohibits reach and experimentation beyond account. 

we cannot admit to being the constancy 

of the self experiment 

and dwell on the deeper truths of the concept 

called the universe. 

we are locally kept 

by the means of 'conscious being' that we use. 

we are timed-space bound as our means 

of identifying that we are. 

we over-claim our presence 

by evidence and circumstance 

that is ruled by identification and account 

which are just techniques of time based distance 

and literal description 

that keep us from further participation in the now 

by abstraction from it ongoing 

without the essential experiment of entering the now 

without the method of experience 

we currently use. 

we have a starting line, a gun, and an event, 

all of which do not naturally occur 

by the method we use to investigate further 

into the world around us. 

we are confined by the method of results 

and the misuse of action going forward. 

we profess from what we claim to know 

as if a means to adventure 

into what we don’t know 

as knowing of itself 

is not a method of inquiry 

that takes us into the depths 

we say we want to go. 

we are mostly baggage as the bags themselves 

with intention to travel the world 

as we have named it 

and to use the method of experience 

as the payoff or reward 

for having accounted of ourselves as doing so. 

we are the psylopcism of existence 

by doing so in an unrealizable way 

and by an unfathomable means. 

think, as it exists, 

is the white cane without a capacity for usage. 

for the cane does not take itself about 

in service to itself. 

it is not even a cane unto its existence 

or a prop of its own accord. 

we tend to function like baggage 

and expect decales to signify 

a sense of pseudo advancement. 

we circumvent our timely knowledge 

by linear thinking 

but actually only define our sense 

of a unknowingly held level of imprisonment. 

language does not support our search 

nor does meaning as we use it. 

with meaning, we cannot get current 

with the dimensions 

or the energetics of existence 

but only paraphrase ourselves 

into an account about it. 

we are deeply engrained in not being present 

and have time as our excuse for that being so. 

in the way we are self referential, 

we are self imposed limits as our evolving. 

we want history and story and self aware 

as our means. 

none of which is relevant 

outside our own sense of conscious being. 

we have yet to invent an evaporative means 

of getting there 

without the baggage of going there 

and then reporting about being there 

in return. 

not a technique that will merit any worth 

in a being sense 

but possibly appreciated in an audience sense 

if accomplished as such. 

we have the world as an idiot light 

where we all honor and attempt to peer out 

into the claimed beyond 

as if the universe is an eye chart test 

of value and merit. 

and yet we have only invented a concept 

for what line three should look like 

for us to say . . .