how do we have it that time exists
when it doesn’t have a life of its own?
the validity of time existing
rests in the witness’s composition of awareness.
if you spectate as audience
then there is a logic for time.
as the space between observations
seems to be noticed as time segmented,
as proof that it does exists.
by then the intrusion
of a next thought occurring
and memory intervening
become profound evidence.
but then thought itself, as its topic,
is never current either.
when acknowledged as such,
action either supersedes thought,
or bypasses thought in its function,
or is victimized by thought intervention.
yes, mental intervention
is a way of the slowing play of being
into this strategic execution
of the assumed proof of time
as an assumption without repute.
actually it is an insistence on our part.
language lobbies for time references.
thought dwells in time composure,
and we can’t get current
with the mind styles we use
to being in the now for starters . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment