when need is kneading

how deep up the food chain of self-consciousness

do we need to go?

do we question the nature and dynamics of self 

in the usage for its benefits or its failures?

do we even resort to questioning,

as if that too suffers from its positioning style?

do we have any method or means 

beyond the mirror responding 

where rhetorical exists 

as if conversational in nature?

does blame do anything else

besides become conventionally steadfast?

how far back in species orientation

to get to fatal methods of usage?

so we went with thought

and got linear thinking's results.

we went with self 

and got fear as creative enterprise.

we went with the spoken word

and got the imprints of belief as steadfast.

we went with species entitlement

and are harvesting in the results.

the brain-trust is in lockdown

relative to worth, empathy, and perspective.

emotionality got seduced and captured

into a mental equivalency as a profession.

feel has no say

only a linear version of mental pronouncement.

can't anyone discover

that the mind is structured into linear procession

and the emotion is literally a hologram of the moment?

the mind wanders with a flashlight as a metaphor

while emotion is present 

but radically interpreted by mental constructions.

emotion doesn't have mood

mind's version of topicals is emotional mood

emotion has no natural language in speak

but it does have a language of presence.

can't venture into topic,

but holds force by tone used in the sounding.

emotion doesn't document.

emotion, left to itself, has no history of intake.

mind is forever the imprint of fear in logical formats.

does holographic imply strategy to you?

does holographic insists on hidden agenda as usage?

emotion is radiance as output, 

yet the whipping post for sensory input

as properly mind ordained.

imagine you are not your thoughts.

you are not your emotions.

but they both are in service to a you. 

maybe more than a self of you.

but not realized as such for now.

how much of thought is now properly humdrum?

how much of feeling is compacted and or repressed?

most of people getting together

is, without realizing it, emotional recovery.

the collective vacantly spreading its wings.

maybe we are all telepathically unconscious,

until we are not.

what would be the seed essence of t.v. 

or freeway traffic, or mobile phones,

or computer access to everything?

assuming we were obviously clueless

about the unacknowledged under-rides

and the overage of capitalization's premise in use.

there is no think possible 

if reaction or revenge is the response.

getting deep witness to the self dilemma,

to the feel of the collective,

to the relationship to the planet itself,

is even beyond race, religion, species perspective.

what would you give to be?

what action would come,

if you were all spent on aliveness?

what if, by method, there are no answers,

because questioning is a subscription

to a method already deemed as doomed.

if yearning is the spirit of intent,

than allow yourself to be drawn

rather than feel yourself 

to be permitted.

each of us, 

as greater than the whole,

yet, in need of awakening . . .