what? say what?

who would be doing,

being aware of their awareness?

now, not for content,

but for the study of method?

pick something to initially be aware of

and see who of oneself attends to that.

then begin to witness,

who of you does the attending 

for awareness purposes.

then find an inner you within you,

to study those techniques used,

to be in witness of that.

and after awhile, 

it begets a deeper level 

of who is the beholder,

the who of you who authors. 

and then, who of you 

is beyond this dedication of consciousness,

to that which precedes the sensing,

then to that which is in residence 

to these cognitions,

and then to that which provides for

all of this in-residence, 

as a self-consciousness usage.

and can further questions arise 

from even further 

beyond this grasp?

maybe the sense of a you,

who does not occupy 

a body, a mind, a feel for?

some very distant overheard conversation

that has no basis to be heard

or made sense of, 

but as if it personally applies.

what about you there,

beyond accountability,

beyond beliefs about self and existence?

somewhere where the constancy is not impeded 

by all of this methodology, 

now striped away

to get to this, that has no basis or bias,

but somehow is.

yet no,

but registers in some inner conscious way.

who is that, that features no-way,

yet that you vaguely identify,

but have no clarification beyond

that it is?

and somehow is, 

a you . . .