this may seem odd to be asking.
but how does meaning work?
what is it set about to accomplish?
who is it within any of us, as humans,
who live for the sensing of meaning
as if it is an attempt at accomplishment?
and what is the distinctive nature of its deeds?
is this all within our sense of clarity as composure?
it seems odd to me
that ascertainment gives us
a buoyancy of continued conscious carriage.
as if of witness
yet conscious within and ongoing,
as defendable securing confirmation.
and who is it of us as witnesses of scrutiny
that is the continuance that allows this to happen,
that embraces, as if in and of our person,
as if embodied and embolden?
is it our forwardness for its passage,
ever so minute
and yet with clarity and distinction?
are we to be in residence
as the elements of the heart of the matter?
are we of oneself in reception
and subsequently firmly agreed,
that all of this, in its composition,
is the work of sequential elementals
in unison and with uniformity,
in design and declaration
and subsequently exist as in our resolve?
it's not that meaning is of sequential uniformity
in its ever changing display as functioning.
yet, for us, is it more powerful
than the search lights of our prayer?
experience does not ever reveal
the birthright of its claim.
if we are the celestials of awareness,
yet of the embodiments of self as registry,
does the experience of meaning
ever journey beyond the inroads
of its own subjective means? . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment