when quantum left the physical,
is that for real
or is it that we had definites about the physical
based on our sensory range?
even with technical assistance
and somehow quantum left.
it was not sensed as physical,
even if it got down to one very tiny,
one infinitesimally looming of oneness.
but then boom, gone.
but is it gone
or unidentifiable by our means?
how far does sensory go
and still seem justified?
does an aura count?
how does lightning count?
it is just the flash and then gone?
what if the issue is not the physical
but us?
what if we predetermine by our limitations?
what we perceive
without regard for what is.
if it is outside our means to render it?
how do we come to grasp, evolve, co-mingle,
when we are just playing mind-games
with everything, as if in a curious fashion?
we window-shop essence
but can't really go there.
we have perusal knowledge
as if the wardrobe for most everything.
but we have life as metaphor.
is it because we are languaged trapped,
because we process as if cognitive-referral?
how quantum is a human laugh?
hell, even the essence of a human sneeze?
words are a look-see existence.
experience has become so secondhand.
could zest ever meet void?
does travel have to involve time and space?
what if empathy is
a oneness vaguely remembered?
what if love is non-conceptual?
what if I just said,
I quantum you?
does that make for a truth we can't embrace?
what if everything in mass
is just anti-quantum?
so how could we be
so left out in the cognitive cold? . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment