what makes whole one

language under-dimensionalizes the feeling's presence.

communication, as expression, seeks demonstration.

and behavior becomes the spoken word,

as if a person was signing their emotional state

without cognitive intervention.

where acting out becomes the say,

all people are in the constancy of this.

but it is usually kept at a minimum,

as foibles or mannerisms of a low-key nature,

as tensions within the body functioning.

but not clearly displayed as more than that.

in many ways, sickness or illness results

after long periods of this stress in denial.

localized tensions that eventually yield 

into displayable results.

the matrix of these feelings, 

not dimensionally reduced into cognitive formats,

present in these ways.

the steeper the mental restraint,

the more varied the resulting behavior can appear.

the intended say is to release as a means,

that which is not held in the confines of reason.

in a sense, madness has its own sense of order

beyond what has been conceived of as sensible.

the irrational invites an act-out reasoning to occur.

imagine a flailing hose spewing water every which way

by appearances as observed.

but within the hose circumstance as pressurized,

the water and the hose are working towards release.

and all else is passively contributing in support,

as in open space,

hose flexibility,

hardness of surfaces in resistance 

and in acceptance of contact.

pressurized water in confinement

against hose restraint is yielding given appearances.

this does not intimately express or display in depth

what appears to be happening.

our comprehension of pressure in varied forms

confronting other pressure in resistant forms

is not readily sensed, 

as much as the apparency of action is.

so much of tension within human existence

goes on below or behind what is commonly sensed.

only the resultive stages reach sensory aware.

we, as cognitively concerned,

approach from the resultive format

working towards recreation to get to sourceful-ness,

to essentially come to be aware of the essence of source

and its methods of function as existence.

this also applies to our nervous system,

our emotion functioning

and a deeper sense of our being,

as in all of the above.

inquiry, piece by piece, 

and the attempt at essence composition, 

as understanding as method is, 

requires an enduring means of approach.

and for that, all we get 

is a potential deeper understanding

not healing, not sure, 

but witness within refinement.

the wizardry of being goes on

with or without our function of comprehension.

we didn't invent a culture that dwells within

the complete expression of confluence of being.

but we live in a culture that pursues by inquiry,

to the shortcomings of culture as so designed.

we don't become the tree.

but we study the tree,

by sawing off the branches we are on.

to see how they fall,

relative to our style of observation.

thus we come to comprehend the nature of the tree

but still remain quite separate from the tree

and its existence relative to us.

eventually there are deeper discoveries to be made.

where we and the tree have so much more in common

than we have gleaned into knowledge.

to the point where all things

are really one thing of essence,

in diverse displays, 

from our current human perspective . . .