the nature of tonal-speak

 

understanding the language of tonal-speak

is where meaning is not definitive

but emotionally situational,

where understanding functions 

as a form of empathy,

where meaning fundamentally 

doesn't have a language base,

but instead, has an expression base.

tonal-speak has a format 

of emotional embeddedness of culture.

for tonal-speak is fundamentally closer

to the spirit of the law

then to the actual letter of the law.

conversations done in this light 

are done in tonal code,

where understanding is not mentally literal

but is emotionally environmental,

where all topics are mental driving instructions

to get to tonal-emotional locations.

tonal-speak has no actual language base 

that is lyrical in origin.

all words are mentally constructed 

separate from feeling's nature.

consider the mind to be linear

while emotion is holographic.

words give mindful inferences and clues

but tones give a sense of emotional locations.

tonal-speak can appear to be the same, 

in the manner of spokenness,

but the reception of it

is distinctly dimensionally different 

in the environment of meaning.

its adequate comprehension 

has more empathetic elements present.

tonal-speak demands

more immersion as understanding's role.

where meaning implies a presence

more than mental comprehension expects.

tonal-speak is done in code.

and that code can appear as

irrational or incomprehensible 

to a logical mind.

this is the expressed differences

between a mind-brain and a heart-brain 

relative to the notion of comprehension . . .