the delicacies behind experience

are there differences between composure and presence?

presence is made up of emotional inwardness

that one could come to consciously feel,

while composure is much more made up of 

the rules that guide apprehension and conditioning 

in order to project to the world in a safe way.

yet one inwardly wants to set up 

a certain self in witness, 

as to how those two,

composure and presence work. 

yet not necessarily to observe,

for what they are producing as experience.

but more so, to sense their methodologies 

and how one's think comes to reside in guardedness 

and how one's feeling is very much generative 

of one's private experience of their own inwardness.

we each are that process ongoing,

yet the essence and the initiative,

the mechanics and the workmanship,

hardly ever surface in raw evidence.

language, as articulation, is rare.

examples are constantly presented

but more so at the resultive of those processes. 

self-witness is delicate inward awareness rigor,

at a level of self-intimacy, 

not approachable by words.

as how would one converse

with one's stream of consciousness?

except be being

and a skillset of witness ever-evolving. . .