the high fiber in knowing
is not the knowledge
but the means of knowledge,
as no fact actually exists
without a context as a framing.
and that framing is of itself
for a factual existence
that predates its current usage.
in the procession of knowledge
the technique of knowing seeks refinement.
for what do you actually get by knowing?
the framing of an ongoing narrative,
a perceptional style that seeks it's own enhancement?
to be in the know
has it's own imprisonment at stake.
knowing is a commitment to an occupancy
and that occupancy is than a presence of awareness.
and as a mentally ordained occupancy,
it is an assumed reality presence.
all of this is subject to the ongoing of influences.
and those methods of influence are deemed to be
more knowledge by its method of attainment.
that which exists as a fact
has a carriage of import
as influence on next moments by a mental process,
in what is believed to be motivation or momentum
to further the line of reasoning as thought provoked.
the maze work of influence becomes subject to input.
knowing is vulnerable to its receivership style.
the cosmetics of fact-ness adds to the deliverance.
knowing by knowledge is open to being staged.
credible is a belief method as a functional process.
how knowing works is subject to influence
beyond the subject matter intended.
but within the methodology of how knowing works,
the impetus for next thought is under this kind of influence.
there are assumptions made about truth
as thought held.
they are fragile in essence
and vulnerable in usage.
all thought unto itself
is without the input of feelings.
not fear feelings
but generative feelings of connectedness,
is suspect to false purpose,
and perspectives that serve that.
the feel-think may become
the operative of consciousness,
as thought is subject to capture
of methods of purpose and deed.
linear thought is subject to
this kind of ongoing influence
and subsequent directives as advanced.
our minds will have to master paradox
as every moment's offering
within the linear modeling as presented.
we are in a maze of our own making
when how thought works is analyzable
to the degree of manipulation and control.
deeper mind-scapes must be reached
where witness is for creation
and not for retribution.
how you feel has to arise above
how your think administrates how you feel.
fear can not be an impetus
as if thought provoked.
the essence of feel
is an immersion
and not an identification.
separatism has to end its rule and function.
oneness of species, life and planet has to emerge.
it is on us as mindfulness
to evolve, not change, into that awareness
as immersion has an emotional holographic presence
in all of us and oneness becomes the arrival
and we evolve to be the means . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment