love can not be objectified.
that searching for love
is an effort at the existence of nonexistence.
love has no properties to be of claim.
no one can be in receivership of love.
the physics of love is the broadcast of being,
even as the universe is in the essence of action.
observation of it or claim for it
is only a distant audience as bystander perspective.
claiming love and its existence as such
is to make it of something identifiable.
it is always in essence, ever spent on being.
no words can identify that which isness offers.
that feeling that one has, that goes on
is without the capacity to be separate
for it be of notice.
to be conscious of love
dissolves into the experience version rendered.
love is the unnoticeable ever outpouring
that can not be spectated.
to give of oneself beyond recognition,
to be in a oneness beyond what sense offers,
to be consumed beyond mindfulness of words,
to sense existence as sacred beyond reason,
all of those acknowledgments
are only indications that are mind held.
what is ever vibrational by conscious consent
carries love deeply within.
but it is beyond what names can label.
the embodiment of that,
if sensed as emittance or embrace,
gives one a feel for what is love.
but feel for love, as mentally construed,
also vacates from the essence of it for the viewing.
as a self, love claimed is just referential
and not from source emittance but from experience
of that which is superficial to the causal of being.
love never lessens to be separate from oneness.
and that is what we always are,
without the possibility of being separate from it,
to either claim or to truly observe.
self claiming love is a lesser state of awareness
than the immersion that love occupies within.
to make us conscious of love
is not that it comes to us,
but that we surrender as a self
to be in that oneness
that travels in the cutting edge of a now.
a now as love that we fail to consciously venture.
yet it is within and throughout,
beyond our means of conscious rendering
into our subjectivity of real . . .
♡
ReplyDelete