beauty is disguised as a sensory experience
but in an in-depth way.
it is the internal motherboard within self
that is switched on
by this method of permission.
that the claim is something seen or sensed
is only the automatic unseenness
of the connection
to a place within,
that rides the wave of self
as grace internally broadcast.
all the while, the commentary suggests that
it is an external of artistry and allure.
experience seems to be the laborer enrolled.
sensory provides for the metaphorical lie,
and we, as apparent bystanders,
become enthralled.
but somewhere very deep within,
there is a constant state
of grace in refinement,
generally beyond one's developed sense
of a self.
it is an almost spiritual pheromone
of divinity as presence
that often times,
leaks into the self-conscious realm
only to be phenomenalized
as experiential worth,
which makes us all recipients,
as both witness and audience,
to a natural state of human as being.
it is a denial of source as a self
as spirit in residence.
our lives are filled with these glances
as the virtuous rendering of beauty,
externally sensed
and thereby internally denied
as a natural ongoing state.
we are that beauty as bliss,
unconditionally so,
but lack the constant access
in a more formal means.
and so beauty is industrially captured
by the phrase:
"beauty is in the eye of the beholder".
but actually beauty is a constant state,
more deeply ingrained,
with the subtler sense of self
than experience has evolved to distinguish.
and as long as experience is separatism made evident
that discovery, however often in a lifetime,
is still believe to be exterior
and occurring to the self
in wondrous fashion.
yet spirit does make its presence known
by means that one, for then,
has a presence for . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment