are we dismantling the ivory tower?
the world has to be out of pie in the sky
or the materialization of dreams
inevitably happens.
so we are soon out of pie
yet dreams ultimately manifest.
so the ivory tower,
as far as it can reach into the sky,
is it realized as just a tall building.
and now we concern ourselves
with the muddledom of its occupancy.
ivory tower candidates get first choice.
so what is that criteria for selection?
okay, who composes the panel
to create those selection priorities?
then what is the administrative means used
in the necessary selection process?
soon there is a collection
of procedural folks present.
they actual don't have a clue
about what an ivory tower consists of
or what it might be even imply.
eventually, it is discovered
that there are no ivory tower experts.
ivory tower occupants don't have expertise
in the composition of ivory elements.
they are just predisposed to be ivory folks.
it is antithetical to them
as a working concept called dismantlement.
so there are ivory towers,
inevitably around.
but they are generally disregarded
as relevant.
so much so, that they are not
any more admitted
to have a physical manifest
worth bothering about.
if there are ivory tower potential candidates,
they quietly live lives away from attention.
some never leave their own heads.
and eventually the phenomenon
as identifiable,
totally disappears,
both as a working reference point
and as an actual occurrence
in a humanity format of existence.
and so the dismantlement of an ivory tower
was really leaving it quite alone.
thereby leaving it
to its own inconsequential manifest devices.
and eventually
without adequate mental terrain.
it's last thought was eventually
the last elephant in the room,
and also its last breath,
before extinction
replaces disappearing memories . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment