an essential problem with understanding
is that you end up knowing.
and knowing has it limitations
of interactional truth.
the deepest of science ventures
into this problem.
science can't explain essence of anything past knowing.
knowing has labeling and description.
in all cases, we end up with knowing,
but that is it.
what we know reflects how we know,
as knowing is only referential, at best.
inquiry beyond that,
wants to address deeper issues.
inquiry eventually wants
to become the essence.
not that that is ever said out loud.
but search for source
is to become the essence of source.
and we are not technically gifted
by our means,
to become that essence,
we consciously seek.
all we get is peripherals to being it.
once we start talking atomic or beyond,
this starts to directly address
our nature of inquiry.
yet we call it science
and we wanted that kind
of mental equivalency
to do the work.
we wanted comprehension up to that task
but even comprehension is still
an audience view.
we are no closer to the essence truth
than we were before we had science
doing this work.
thee days, training minds to do science
is not advancing the script more deeply.
sure, there are more connections made
and more cross-referencing done,
a deeper integrative view developed.
but isness obtained, essence imbibed,
still makes our world into only tool usage,
at best.
monks and mystics are pursuant of the same
but from a radically different
sense of approach.
if oddities happen in humans
in a unique way,
we have ways of dismissing them.
we are ever phenomenalizers
to the immediate and nth degree.
we have mental reductionism to everything.
science wants to take us there,
where no one has actually gone as such.
but science has brain baggage as a necessity.
and understanding are the decals
of proof positive travels.
yes, we have experience for its trippyness,
but not as our evolutionary means.
our evolution demands going forward
and seriously not enrolling a lesser state
of the what or the how.
much less attending to it that familiar way,
in the first place.
what we refer to as genius,
is in each of us
as our evolutionary means.
but it's not thought provoked.
and experience only lessen that state
of its foremost existence.
we are all so close to evolving,
yet constantly and prominently distracted.
knowing, as our means,
really gets in the way . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment