the 'is' and 'does' show

 

how 'is' and 'does' fight amongst each other.

we are where 'is' always wins

but we always bet on 'does'.

the Las Vegas betting line 

always favors 'does'.

that's because evidence 

over promotes 'does'.

sure 'is' is representational,

but 'does' is way more action packed.

'is' maybe best at substantial

but 'does' is animated motion,

appeals to our sense more directly.

in effect, promotes and supports

our being human more evidentially

than 'is' does.

'is' is a conundrum of being.

it's medical and somewhat scientific 

in nature.

we want 'does' to win every time.

we easily come to bet on 'does',

but 'is' is just things.

things that we make do 'does'.

we want action to be in our sensory range,

where we can actualize it 

as animated experience.

we really pass on 'is' as stuff.

after all, we're stuff of ourselves.

and how much do we get off on that

without some grand notion of action?

the betting line on 'is' 

may still be centuries away,

but 'does'…… 

'does' is a broadway show

for us on a daily basis.

so if attention is our currency

and 'is' and 'does'

are the main combatants,

then we are primarily devoted

to a loser mentality,

but experientially making the most of it . . .