what 'miracle'

the demystification of the 'miracle' experience

is to address the phenomenology

in its observational style

as well as its 'happen-to-me' receivership 

in its audience reception style.

that process is underscored

by unsaid but implied

negative affirmational premises,

namely, any sense of the implication of godsend. 

the method of viewing

is as if 'separate from' yet 'happen to'.

the generative use of interpretive mental equivalency

is as a worthy first person account

and also the claim of positive victimhood

to be in isolated receivership

as if not worthy of cause-status possible.

mental-equivalency overstates or outright denies

the emotional components or other  elements in play

as if to be in service to the mental account,

when the first order is emotional in nature,

even though experience will cater to mind account

as an event that 'happened to me'

rather than an emotional occurrence 

with unfolding elements continuing to privately occur,

even though not available or registered to be relevant 

in the experience 

to be an expressed version of the miracle 

as if it just happened out of normalized context,

and then is gone . . .