compromise is about the breakdown-breakthrough,
about attention span's slippage from details amassing,
from the sheer weight of distractions building
on the grip intended to be of a singular focus.
compromise is about the unanticipated gathering
of otherwise-considerations being mentioned
as the expected sustainment beyond what is prepared for.
compromise is about assumptions
loosing their status of being functionally true,
or from presumptions
making more of their case to be noticed,
as the profoundly ignored,
dispelling some of the original beliefs.
compromise is the confrontational
taking concessionary means towards rewards
while intruding beyond confidence's prepared account.
is compromise really a tug of war,
expressed as loosing its grip?
or is compromise more like a game of checkers,
where last checker left, is a win?
and the art of compromise
was it really all about
just the action in play?
No comments:
Post a Comment