to accept suffering as self-generative
which there by has attendable means, 
there must be a deeper sense of being in play 
that can surmise and embrace and still be that deeper source 
behind all of that that is 
pressing to be experientially evident. 
the spiritual wisdom of suffering is to acknowledge it, 
not be deeply distracted by it 
and address it from a place more deeply within, 
that allows oneself to administer 
from a purer state of consciousness 
that is interfacing with the actual pain and it particulars 
and not in response to the lesser self laboring 
in one’s conclusive account. 
if I am preoccupied as the victim 
then I have no locatable position 
to be the self-healer involved, 
even though I would be the best qualified 
and most prominent party, in the first person, 
to attend to said circumstance and to alter 
the experiential overload and to initiate 
the necessary elements to end the suffering, 
no matter what level it has been sustained at, 
from physical to emotional to psychological levels included.
all are within range 
of first person self attendance immediately. 
suffering is not a paradigm 
but only an observational flashing, with the potential 
to affect consciousness in a consuming manner 
when not more deeply addressed. 
a person, essentially at cause, is to not be at affect 
but also to be at affect of a deeper undisclosed cause, 
dependent upon which has a stronger conscious origin 
within one’s sense of
oneself. 
whether it is verbal abuse, physical brutality, 
personal injury, or full-blown illness, 
a deeper sense of self can be in response 
rather than reaction to them all. 
No comments:
Post a Comment