free will is a form of species-misogyny,
in that it rewards those who reinforce the concept
and punishes those who deny its relative existence.
it makes the brain-work self-inclusionary
of its own making.
it's a pretend that lives in its own invention.
we can't really ask if we have free will
because we have no direct answer,
except to act out,
as if that is, in and of itself,
proof in its own making,
without the conceptual assumptions made,
ever to be in question.
it's clearly a species mirror phenomenon.
we could have just as easily asked,
who is the fairest
or who is the superlative of anything requested.
but then again,
we went with free will.
how ponderous of us to ask.
all I get from the free-will phenomenon
is that it represents a release from a past,
an end of a restraint.
and therefore the oppression is gone
and free will can be claimed as a counter-state.
but lack of obsession, as overbearing, to me
does not call to mind a state of free will,
given the nature of experience.
I don't get that free will is on the menu.
one might as well sneeze fully and loudly
and call that an example of free will . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment