the ever-birth abounding

life is not momentary rebirth,

in that, experience is the aliveness, 

as the measure.

experience is the result.

and how results gets ingested,

limits the future, 

as for possibilities. 

we are all terming toward lesser states

as directed by experience 

as a formal guide.

we fall into repetitious outcome,

when experience is the directive.

we are essentially drawn to the cutting edge

but experience only superficially defines 

towards familiar as recognition's magic.

if we channeled the unknown of us

rather than projected 

towards contextual acceptance,

our path toward evolution 

would be breathtaking.

but we are a species of indoctrination,

of the first order.

and therefore, 

the lowest common denominator, 

is our means for establishing worth.

Machiavellian load-bearing 

is as establishment.

as a theoretical joke 

but possibly a sincere inquiry,

do you think, 

that if anyone reached enlightenment,

they would want to come back 

and tell us all about it?

there is no mediumship of tell 

that would render, decipher, encode, 

decode, construct, construe 

or paraphrase to any experiential adequacy.

we would all still be audience, 

possibly entertained.

we have to go into think 

but not ravage it back into thought.

we would have to stay 

on the cutting edge of think

until we get to an awareness 

before it has surrendered to words

we would have to sense 

that we are channeling 

as an awareness beyond self-limitations.

not for pronouncement purposes

but as an integral connection 

to possibly higher mind,

for the lack of a better understandable term.

so if we keep the think

but abandoned the thought,

maybe that seems incomprehensible,

that one would go beyond 

a self-sense of awareness

to a means beyond conventional experience,

beyond an assumed viable means 

of presence as communication.

in a quantum way, 

this is happening all of the time.

we are yet unaware and beside our selves,

if it happens to us as in through us.

the intuitive, the psychic, the inspirational

and the spiritual, though non-religious,

all are pathways of influence 

beyond our mundane account 

of self-existence.

there is, as a mediumship, which offers

but our rational overrides, 

as if linear-thinking, predominates.

this is our home planet, 

as we cultivate it,

for now.

but how we possess what we claim

is basically un-evolved human-nature custodial activity.

or our lives are not momentary rebirth

because we don't live or practice 

in that way of consciousness.

if we channeled in free-verse consciousness,

then quantum would have 

a conscious mediumship,

and we would be, more the presence

of the ever-birth, abounding . . .