there is this phrase,
“success is just failure that hasn’t happened yet”.
or the converse,
“failure is just success that hasn’t happened yet”.
is this pessimism versus optimism?
the seduction is neither but acceptance of the premise
itself.
framing in this way as a perspective style
accepts the
confines offered.
being results-oriented as the payoff diminishes the worth
of
each moment
by living for a future that will somehow pay off
or reward the
expectations harnessed from the past in doing so.
premise as frame, devalues this moment and its richness
for
the promise of entanglements that bind the story being told
to a way of life
that limits both self awareness
and also creates an emotional hostage kept
alive
via past and futures
that do not permit a presence in the moment to
evolve.
Preoccupation with pasts and futures, however constructed,
make the
present ‘a contingency of spent-ness’ offered up
as the realism of the moment
when truly that moment or this moment as it is,
is buried in orientations and
perceptual styles
that vacate the possibility of presence in this moment
for a
projection of presence that is orchestrated with preoccupation as the driver.
If the world of expectancy is a given
and the skill sets applied are of that
nature,
then the observance of now is on a check list to be checked off
and the
rest of now is just filled with un-essentials of a distractive nature
and the
arrival of the impending or anticipated is the reward
which takes us back into
the premise conflict
as results are designed to prove one’s worth.
there is this phrase,
“success is just failure that hasn’t happened yet”.
or the converse,
“failure is just success that hasn’t happened yet”.
is this pessimism versus optimism(?)
as a way of consciousness
as a functional evolutionary life?