True
emotions cannot, in essence, be experienced.
The
five senses, as they are currently developed and used, in a reality setting,
are skillset trained away from higher vibrational octave interaction.
Experience itself is a selective frequency addiction. The way our experience
format is trained, literally, 24/7, uses methods and techniques that place us
in a time continuum with symbolism and recognition skills that override a more
subtle enterprise of field presence in an expanded sense of being. The seat of
true emotions thrives outside of time. Our use of experience is at the fringe
of this but in a time bound way. Intangible frequencies are at the higher end
of the vibrational frequency range. The more complex the presentation of this,
the less mass to demonstrate it with and the more improbable that the senses
can conclusively provide a basis leading to an understanding in the way we do
understanding of itself. There is no clear separation to any of this in the way
we format mass and its location to itself because in this case, fields overlap
and pass through each other without conflict or contrast evident to us. Just
our attention on some thing that we reference
and
assume as separate from us is not functionally the case. Our intention puts us
in the mix without identifying that to be so since our level of conscious
involvement is almost topical by nature because we assume sensory driven
principles and linear logics that fundamentally don’t apply in these types of
situations of interaction with the non-physical universe. From our lower
vibration outset, notice is locational to start with.
Notice
assumes boundaries that in the deepest sense do not exist but we are unaware in
skills to sense that directly as part of what we do in those interactions. At
higher vibrational frequencies, we struggle to make translational sense of what
is actually happening from our experiential point of view. We are marginalized
by our mass metaphor. We do a form of understanding that does not penetrate the
essence environment but tours what we can grasp and return to our previous
sensorial, metaphorical, experiential account, which takes us back to square-one
assumptions and baggage that does not help with the translation or the transcendence
we would hope to entertain as transformational and ongoing.
No comments:
Post a Comment