we, as a species,
actually think silence exists.
yet, we don't actually know
of silence directly.
we know it,
by the lack there of.
we only are aware
of the claim of it,
by a framing context of contrast.
sound, we know,
but only in a limited fashion,
as that which is in our audio range.
there are sounds above and below that,
but we are not attuned.
so anything outside of what we sense,
is then perceived as silence.
we really have no clue as to silence.
for us, it's all relative,
as in experience-endowed.
our concept of silence
is somewhat sensory based.
but if sound was a transitional phase
of matter versus non-matter,
what would sound actually be?
we, as species, are wildly displaced
from that sense of existence.
we are assumptions buried deep,
away from the functioning of sound,
unless it is experientially hearable to us.
we crave silence,
sort of.
which is to say,
we are contextually bound to sound
or the lack of it.
thus we claim that in immediacy,
as silence from our experiential point of view.
so craving silence,
could come to mean what?
possibly realms outside our experiential range?
a sense of being,
not accounted for
or in denial there of?
how to question silence,
as if to obtain relevant audio-answers . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment