the process of reverse-engineering enlightenment
is discovering the subtleties and subtext
between the workings of content and context.
where content would give a sense for the particulars
while context would begin to describe the rules in play
that govern how content occurs
and also how it is viewed
as to what are the priorities and the operatives
that generate context into content
which is operatively viewed in a normative way.
the reality driver is the consumption of content
while the evolutionary driver is the discovery
and the deconstruct of the workings behind context.
eventually the surrender
from the occupancy of one’s story
is some of the original work.
some humans have more conscious direct access
to their full circle gene.
they more advantageously discover
the shortcomings of drivenness
as well as the long forms of drawnness.
deconstruct is one of the integrity methods
of surrender as a transition process
by giving up the observance of the all
to come into the integration of ‘be’
the work of language as mental equivalency
is devoted to being linearly, one directional.
it features a flashlight pinhole view of the world
under the assumption of fear,
laden with the presumption of darkness.
knowing is a operative under that set of principles.
remembering is a function of this mindfulness.
yet an emotional version of remembering
can have a long-form holographic for some
and can provide a full circle sense,
an evolutionary sense of personal connection.
the deconstruct, as an operating principle,
goes past the notion of reliance on experience.
it requires a deeper emersion
in order to identify the elementals,
such as emersion beyond mindfulness.
the deconstruct is a reverse engineering process.
it cannot function from a linear thinking format.
machiavellianism is just a collective show
of thought-form hands
at the most unconscious level
of their first person personal account.
an insatiability beyond understanding’s thirst
is the self as the self of this experiment.
it is this process of rediscovery by immersion
and then the eventual demystification
of the more predominant reality tested sense of self
to get past the toxicity of personalized experience.
where as an impersonal but integrated sense of self,
as in the witness view
a more dimensional sense of self,
and has far more depth and
is more intrinsic to a deeper sense of cause
from a multi-realm-use perspective.
enlightenment is not an audience view.
what we would take as the meaning of enlightenment
does not exist.
look, no one would go to enlightenment
to get an experience.
enlightenment does not feature experience.
once there,
there is no one there.
there is no one
except the one
and one
does not come back for the pittance of experience
from the all . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment