the myth about change 3/12/18

there is no such things as breakthrough.

what you break out from gets referenced

as the framing for the breaking out

and then is carried forward as external baggage

as if for future orientation’s cause.

even breakout, as method, suffers

from the same syntactical nature of approach.

this, as seduction, is overly promoted

by the confines of linear thinking

which myth-fully endorses the concept of change

when change actually refers to

a person-centered experience

and not actually the whole of the environment

still existing as if a surround

honoring that same perspective.

might as well have a paper-bag

over one’s sensing of the world

with a single pinhole

for a sensory reference point of view.

then it becomes clear

that what you respond to as change

is really only your limited experience range

of what fully surrounds you.

yet to you, this represent change

and can be regarded as a breakthrough.

maybe you have broken out

of the confinement of familiar

but in either case change does not exist

only the perception from a self sense claims it.

the reality is that change exists a constant

as in, change is change ever-changing.

and it is only a false assumption

that constancy exists

from our limited perspective.

we therefore claim it to be true

when in really, it is only a reflection

about how limited our senses feed us clarity.

and how much we claim such isolation

that we are separate from the it-of-it all

and therefore have the working method

which allows us to invent

the concept of ‘change’

and then subsequently advancing the concepts

of breakout and breakthrough

not realizing the self isolation

that that truly implies.

it is like we all live in phone-booths of self,

slightly fogged-over from our own body heat

as the sense of our selves.

and we are phoning our knowing selves

to do two things:

ask where are we?

and to tell ourselves,

this is what we sense is going on around me,

giving ourselves mindful still-shots

to work with  . . .