Everything that is
happening
in the manifested
world,
by our method of
experience,
is in fact,
from the nature of
experiencing,
only a mirror
reflecting
the how and the what
of everything
that we know
and the depth of
that mirror only corresponds
to the length of our attention span.
Experience does not
take us
to the essence of
things
as much as it
describes
and therefore
indirectly reflects
the
methodology used to experience
and the affirmation
performed
by that methodology
that we claim
is somehow objective
and substantive
to represent the
physics
or actual
functioning of the world.
These experiential
conclusions we reach
are a kind of short
sighted myopia
in which we take
ourselves out of the pursuit
of actual
participation with life
and make mental
stands
that are
constructions of our style of knowing
that may not reflect any new knowledge
but do represent our
way of knowing
for what we know.
It’s a matter of
saying
there is a
difference
between a mental
retention in a response
and our channeling
via a response.
Even if we did have
a deeper glimpse,
or a partial
immersion,
our style of
consciousness sends us
to a place in which
we withdraw
and phenomenalize as
the sensory experience
in experiential terms
that are
dissociative from a depth
and an immersion of
whatever it was
that it was in its
isness.
We presume that
sensory as contextual
is an adequate
representation of isness
when in fact, it is
a kind of closure myopia
in which we extract
from the baggage we
take with us
so that we come back
to sensible reality
with either decals
of the isness
or have sent
postcards from the isness
that are clipped
and do not
adequately capture
the immersion
essence
in full dimensional
perspective
an entrainment of
us.
No comments:
Post a Comment