For most people the concepts of think and thought seem to
run together as one process where think might precede thought but the two go
hand in hand in an unnoticed fashion as experience might reveal them upon first
diligent notice. It would seem hard to distinguish them as unique and quite
separate since, for practical purposes. they seem to serve the same end-point
cause. But for me, they actually are quite unique and serve very different
initial causes even though there would be a learning curve necessary to
establish exactly what I mean since what I mean and how I mean that to function
would be in question for most people to start with based upon the speed with
which each can take place and who has developed the witness to self watch this
in action. But imagine that think is inherently ongoing in humans in such a way
where it primarily exists before and independent of thought. And thought is
very much a production of culture, and the further embellishments that follow
such as cognition in a real world sense of language and observation towards the
clarity of experience as a result of these efforts in that vain. In a timeline
way, think maybe an initiatory stage that passes quickly into thought relative
to recognition or identification and the placement of content in context. From
my viewpoint think has nothing to do with observation or dualism but everything
to do with being immersed in the void before cognition reframes what is then recognizable
as experience becoming objectified. Think and thought may not even share the
same sourcefulness but have become synonymous as assumed to be one in the same,
as a continuous process. Certainly in the most profound sense thought lives off
of think’s reveal, even though that timeline shows little of what think is and
maximizes what thought then produces from that. For me, pure think does not
abide by the same rules as thought does and is quickly dismissed from mattering
except for the results that thought can harvest as meaningful. Pure think taps
into the deep universe by immersion while thought, even the best of thought, is
exacting and referential to that of a reality cause. For me think is a oneness
state very different then the way we go about accounting and creating our
meaningful lives. Pure think is not us as separate entities but us surrendering
into a connected state with the deep truth of the universe and experience is
not the genuine outcome as a result. Language and observation and identity do
not formally exist in this pure state. Dualism is not a method that takes us to
there. Actually there is no there in that regard. It is prejudicial for me to
speak about that as if it were just another state when what that is encompasses
all of what we inhabit but does not create any sense of separateness to give it
dimension or a context for observation. It purely does not produce audience and
therefore our conventional notion of experience is set aside without the chance
of a comparative truth to be rendered. It is isness without self-consciousness
as a boundaried sense of being. Therefore I risk to say what I am going to say
to see if language base dialogue can give any sense of orientation as to how I
mean what I mean when I presumably compare or contrast the different worlds of
think and thought. I am only asking you to go to the far edges of understanding
and firmly leap into an unknowable way of sentient participation within your
own being. Maybe you are at the furthest edges of what experience has ever
provided for you in understanding ways. Go there and risk into the unknowable
and find your connectivity with the quantum of the universe. It won’t answer
back. You only have the all of you that has left to be one with it all. There
is no contention, just the expression of being that passes through you by what
ever means that does not distract you from this immersion. Self-consciousness
does not exist there as an impediment. There is no mass or solids or
identification happening. Fluid without names or logic or account is a recoil
response. Oneness pervades without observation. From this point of
connectedness, I ask you to read the different worlds of think and thought as I
propose them in the grossest sense that understanding could provide…
No comments:
Post a Comment