there were no reasons
things wound up the way they did
Inwardly, share with me
the riddle of your passage
with physical death
while I am here
to anchor and deed with living.
Gift me with glimpses,
presence, and responses
to what is happening for you.
Take with you
how I cherish your being
and reflect for you
on the impact
you have on my life.
Find a way
to let me be with you
in your passing.
Teach me the signs
of your grace in transition.
I am calmed
as you are calming.
I journey along
but do not have
the sight or depth
unless you are the offering.
I am a servant
to the expanse you face.
I can never return from
where you now take me.
It is not that
I am dying your death
but rather I am living
a deeper richness.
You exemplify your passage
and it is answers
to my blindness.
Your spirit comes forward
as you leave
and I leave my personality
to embrace what you offer.
We are there
as never before,
revealing more
of my spirit to me
then I imagined.
You are evident
and eventful to me.
I discover a deeper love
of myself
in order to give back to you.
You are the gift given
and I am the gift I receive
from your offering
where we are becoming one
in your absence.
I am more the spirit
of myself
in honoring your life.
I do not want
memories of you.
I will live into
this connection
shared from now.
My heart is changed
for loving you now
has changed me.
They call it your death
but I live it into my life.
I am more of us
than we were.
The thanks
I would give you for this
is really to live more fully
from this place
with everyone across my life
from this day forward.
As you go
see me this way.
Call on me
any way you can.
I want to participate
across the divide
until there is none,
until there is nothing to give
and nothing to receive.
For there
as for here,
we are all becoming one . . .
How is there joy
in caring for the dying
when there is no training
for the spontaneous turn of events
that occur daily?
It appears that the normal life
is on hold
and something substantial
is standing in the way
that requires constant attention
either by oneself
or by a support staff
that often needs
a certain amount
of input and response.
Eventually each moment
is subjected to a reframe.
It all becomes surreal.
Odd remembrances often surface.
Emotional links, long forgotten,
find contact and presence
as the river of feelings
spontaneously fills each effort
of care and concern.
A dialogue with no apparent words
continues in silence,
for the most part,
as separate coherencies
continue their journey
sharing common space
and circumstance in passing.
Popular methods for the avoidance
of death issues include
denial, indifference,
service, condolences,
food, vacancy, and any activity
that does not involve
emotional honesty
in a direct fashion.
Being glued
to the physical presence,
for whatever the reasons,
is difficult.
Experiencing someone dear
in ongoing pain
and all the general
difficult considerations
and communications that occur,
even in the best of circumstances,
has a wearing effect
on being present for that person
who is dying.
It is not at all like the rest of life
as we usually independently live it.
To be patient
in unfamiliar circumstances
with the intercession of strangers
and their financial
or medical agendas is a challenge.
Protocols and paperwork
become alibis for deeper feelings
that seem to have no natural outlet
or functional presence
under the circumstances.
In what we do
with the story of living,
death becomes more like
the marks of punctuation
in the story line.
Death is more
the commas and periods.
Death is rarely the nouns
and ever so remotely
the verbs for the living.
Death signals last chapters
and last lines.
Death in the form
of perpetration,
infers, “the end”.
Murders and suicides
and genocides easily register
as involvements in retributions
before or after the fact.
Births are rarely
“pay it forwards”,
but deaths are many times
paybacks.
Justified in someone’s mind
as payment for
or towards a cause.
It is a summation
of another’s life
as a commodity
suitable for currency
in the greater scheme
of things.
It is the equation
where death is the “equals”
or “totals line” to be drawn.
All the subtle nuance formalities
of one’s thinking around death
are conditioned
by the social training
for the experience of death,
everything from friend
to a family member.
a dance hall gal.
The tickets of convention
seemed to be dispensed
by breathing onward.
The dance card is a flat screen
of idle thought rooted deeply
in the vacancy of dreams.
The dreams that do speak
may have an innocent truth to them.
The lament is of aspirations
called out as muttering in the night.
These are the hidden elements
of self identified,
the muted themes of self
yet to be realized.
The dance is of itself
a besiege made of obstruction.
If not for a still-point of self,
remote but not removed,
that takes what dance there is
and refines its,
there would be evidence
of its interior composition.
As for the partners,
there is, at times, a passage.
The selves within are present
but distant
bumping up against
what is offered by the others.
Occasionally there would be
a moment, a touch, a glance,
even full contact.
The exchange of dreams expands.
This movement bestows.
Those connection
becomes an embrace.
The sun of selves
possibly could be exchanged,
for these still-points,
in spite of the appropriateness,
to sum their inner fates
. . . and dance . . .
Evolution is not change
but is the capacity
to expand and embrace
everything as ongoing.
Being preoccupied with character,
as others would account
for everyone,
is not about evolution
but about appearances
and about our acts
of voluntary control
at efforting
for a moral conviction.
Evolution is about
integrity of spirit
and becoming conscious
of its means and expressions
in cleansing to the awareness
and the presence of soul.
So that anger maybe
but a energized sentinel
of source
or purveying surveyor
of the interior land,
a volatile town crier
of the inward night,
so to speak,
that privately signals a richness
with and from within
that inexcusably surfaces
from time to time
and requires dedication
of refined purpose
and full body conviction
of source-fullness in being
to unfold and clarify.
That anger is a cause worthy
of engagement
at every opportunity
is to spawn,
from these as breadcrumbs
that widen the palate
for living richly
from within…….
There can be such intensity
in our response to something
that may have done no more
than seem to threaten
or attack some place
of hypersensitivity.
A guarded place where
there is vulnerability.
What is it
about our self-sensitivity
that eventually,
more than likely
deduction reveals themes
and messages that seem
out of context
for the apparent demonstration
of the rest of us in our lives?
How is it
to come into acknowledgment
of a greater sense of being
that does not fit the storyline
but still it is there?
Are we not more the contradictions
than the appropriate players
we so easily claim?
Is this what happens
to protectiveness
when it reaches the extreme?
Or is it that normalcy,
in is limitations
of comparative policing
and subsequent monitoring,
create agreement that is of itself
a popular extreme?
That we have placed
cognitive agreement
of the obvious
as an absolute
over what we feel and sense
and tune into yet then disregard?
Who is it in us
that calls out something extreme
as if we can have distance
from it or disown it
or disregard our self
for being of it or with it?
Yes, there is anger
as if contextually bound
by its fullness to a now,
as a conundrum
of compelling disbelief
yet acted upon
and acted out.
Is there something more
than just frustration behind it?
Is the sense of frustration,
the first internal self-bloodhound
to signal something
disturbing from within?
Is frustration really a pre-process
that wants answers
without really unfolding
the vastness of the internal terrain?
Is frustration really just
an exclamation for the benefit
of expectation’s resolve
and nothing more?
How appearance-loaded is life
and backstage mum is living?
Pealing back the layers
by repetitious attention
is to discover more charge
then cause,
more inward buzz
then outward circumstance.
Is this an imbalance
of the human predicament?
Is this a circumstance
where ‘reality’ truth
overwhelms ‘energetic’ truth
by substantiation,
rational construction,
the reach for conclusion’s positions,
as if safety were at hand
or knowing that you are loved
were one of the consensus
conclusions needed
to quell the storm from within?