we create story
as compensative moments
There is a leap
that cannot be experienced.
In fact maybe ‘leap’
is not the right term.
Leap may have expectations,
maybe even visualizations
and some notion of form and manner.
This leap may have
a conventional start place
like the thought or an intention
and some conjure of motivation
followed by some sense
of movement necessary.
But no, this leap,
although apparently recordable
in time
is really timeless.
No I am not saying
it did not happen
but it is not easily experienced.
This is a leap
of nothing in particular
possibly a transcendence of a leap.
This is a leap of indefinable means,
a leap without obvious trappings
of circumstance
and anticipated outcome.
It is not a leap
from one place to another.
It is the transcendence of leap
as leap-ness.
It is a leap so profound,
that you leap
and you leave your senses
for their history,
leaving your mind
for its technical guidance,
possibly even leaving your body
for its act.
It can never be only attempted.
It has no origin or predecessor.
It does not exist
in a comparative manner.
It just is.
by this leap,
is exposed as falsely adequate.
So . . . what I am saying,
I cannot say.
What you are hearing me say,
you can only hear
as yourself saying
what you cannot hear
but can know.
You know you even knew
before you came to know.
And that your knowing
fails to take you there
because there is a you
who is already there,
even before . . .
“the leap” to there.
Once you leap,
you can’t agree or disagree.
There are no more bleachers,
no more understandings,
and no more means,
just this leap of no means . . .
In humans,
philosophy is born
and blooms with retention,
bathed in an electricity
of the mind.
This lives as a life
suited within an enclosure
of experience
and under the influence
of bodily chemistry.
Eventually this body,
housing the philosophy
of choice, ages and dies.
But the philosophy does not,
it departs dressed
in the travel wardrobe
of spirit
to ride the seven seas
beyond the seven senses
of human endeavor.
Philosophy allows for
a forbiddenness to live
unkempt, unclear, unconfined,
For irrational truth
to have a life
carried from within,
nurtured by attention given
and a curiosity
blessed with innocence
yet defined
by order and control.
Philosophy is a kind
of Candida of being
that gives spirit a window
of opportunity
to embrace beyond proof
and possibly beyond display.
Belief maybe a phantom limb
of assistance.
A greater whole is eating away
at life as limitation.
Cells are given a consciousness
to return to the universe
when human debt is done.
Philosophy is a label from afar.
It is generally spoken
from the outside looking in.
It suggests a vitality
beyond measure.
It is working the self
beyond its means.
Philosophy is a French kiss
of mindfulness
by setting language aside,
where by all accounts
are irrelevant
as spoken
and electric as lived.
It is an ocean unnamable
and without surface to sail.
You either swim the flow
or drown treading in resistance
to what is for oneself.
It is not summation
but a drawnness imploring
more of a conscious connection
to be made
as expression of being.
Go with it
as long as you do not name it
your philosophy lives you . . .
The g-force of giddy
is hardwired
with uppity glitches,
involuntary freefalls
of bumpy laughter,
alternate dimensions
playing hide and seek
with imaginary friends
joining in play.
Certainty is drunk
as an intoxicant.
There is a seventh sense
based on the premise of silly.
Time for now,
is this wild ride of a life.
Radical motion
is a calming state of stillness.
There are no handrails
to hinder falling up.
The body is jellified reminders
of containment.
What gurgles is what boils.
Exhausting efforts at inhales
are often needed.
Dizziness is a bystander status
showing distant concern.
Feeding on what is meltdown
is warming.
Sanity is unconsciousness
coming up soon.
There is a state of coma
as exhaust is recovery.
The g-force of giddy
has just passed through.
Find for me,
a spirit
without impulse inclined
or inhibitions opposing,
Find for me,
a sky
with no dimensions on display,
a language
without depiction’s slur,
a thought
that cannot recall itself.
Find for me,
a method
without repetition’s benefit,
an awareness
without a reference point,
an original intent
that includes all variance,
All form is lacking
in deeper dimensions.
All speech
is secretly muttered
in lament and dismay.
All comprehension arrives
fashionably late.
All redemptions pay
an unreasonable ransom.
as agenda in disguised.
All agreements
have conclusions
on retainers in fine print.
The concept of all
is a trivia nightmare.
The assumption of all
is a management position.
The work of the all
is an exercise in separation.
The essence of all
is a compelling arrangement.
My connection to the all
is a whole other matter.
My participation in the all
has only one option:
the now about that,
without any
of these summations,
the now about that,
without
definitive interventions,
the now about that,
without the bribe
of expectations,
the now about that,
without
separation’s reactions,
the now about that,
without control
as employment,
the now about that,
with only all
of everything in play.
How about the all
of that now?
There are so many labels
in a relational world.
We are knowing them
mostly from the outside in.
As with most everything
that includes myself,
there are constant senses
for reference at my side.
There is a verbal mentor
within me
assisted by a kibitzer,
and also a chorus
of inner voices
with their perspectives
and opinions.
All seem to function
as stand alones
but intimately so.
were just distant introductions.
Mind you, at an inner distance
but not more than concepts.
They are a curious find
and initially,
somewhat strange
to follow along,
yet not unlike
the initial concept
of understanding a mirror.
That there is . . .
and then there is me,
with a closeness
yet still foreign.
Eventually
there is gross evidence
of the sameness
for my sense and my self.
This is all somehow elusive
and yet very non-demanding.
All efforts and pursuit
were my interests.
Sometimes
it is like “hide and seek”.
Many times,
it is startlingly timeless.
I had a working concept
and revisited with it
into refinement.
Now questions
the mental chauffer.
Does not experience
pass itself off
as the journey?
Always experience
is attempting to be
in the same breath as me.
But isness and suchness
works with tools
that need no tending.
They work with tools
more profound than animation.
They are always more subtle
than I am sensory aware.
Ground/figure
is a very local application.
Subject/object
is really a hobby
done out of habit.
With isness and suchness,
I am saying goodbye